Author Topic: Doctor Who - The Regeneration Game  (Read 142466 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ultimatum

  • SunDog Pilot
  • *****
  • Posts: 3365
    • View Profile
Re: Doctor Who - Time-shattering Spoilers, be warned.
« Reply #750 on: July 24, 2011, 01:35:22 pm »
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WM7AMKdamao" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WM7AMKdamao</a>
 :)

Offline bad Karma

  • Phoenix Fighter
  • **
  • Posts: 157
  • It's not me, it's you. I'm not sorry.
    • View Profile
Re: Doctor Who - Time-shattering Spoilers, be warned.
« Reply #751 on: July 26, 2011, 01:24:31 pm »
0:32.

Are you still there?

Offline Haseri

  • Lode Runner
  • *****
  • Posts: 2224
    • View Profile
Re: Doctor Who - Time-shattering Spoilers, be warned.
« Reply #752 on: August 28, 2011, 02:15:15 am »
It's back.

What did people think?

Offline Krakow Sam

  • Moderator
  • Dungeon Sieger
  • *****
  • Posts: 24493
  • Stern dissaproval
    • View Profile
Re: Doctor Who - Time-shattering Spoilers, be warned.
« Reply #753 on: August 28, 2011, 03:16:14 am »
Pretty good. I figured Melz was River almost as soon a she turned up, and the episode had less focus on the Nazis than I expected, but otherwise, most enjoyable.
Sam is basically right, he's just cranky.

Offline Person21

  • Crystal Castle Gem Eater
  • *****
  • Posts: 2762
    • View Profile
Re: Doctor Who - Time-shattering Spoilers, be warned.
« Reply #754 on: August 28, 2011, 08:42:44 am »
That episode had far too little Hitler in it
Person21 - As enjoyed by Veraal.
A wise Surface to Air Missile once said about marrying 9 year olds in Saudi Arabia "Its pretty hard to tell if a 9 year old is going to be hot when she grows up, kids change a lot, usually, seems like a bad system. That cute little nine year old you married could end being a fat, zitty teenager."

Offline Neoadept

  • Fooblitzky Fooble
  • *****
  • Posts: 4268
  • Has a nice hat
    • View Profile
Re: Doctor Who - Time-shattering Spoilers, be warned.
« Reply #755 on: August 28, 2011, 09:07:34 am »
But exactly the right amount of Rory punching Nazis.
Nefarious?  Nearly.  Ne’er-do-well?  Never!  Neither nearly names this narrator.  Naive and knowledgeable, notorious and inscrutable, this nascent Nero is known naturally as Neoadept.

Offline /lurk

  • Dragon Warrior Slime
  • *****
  • Posts: 5251
    • View Profile
Re: Doctor Who - Time-shattering Spoilers, be warned.
« Reply #756 on: September 03, 2011, 08:19:21 am »
I just got around to watching it.


Yeah so hey why didn't the poison kill River?
Not a winner anymore.

Offline Haseri

  • Lode Runner
  • *****
  • Posts: 2224
    • View Profile
Re: Doctor Who - Time-shattering Spoilers, be warned.
« Reply #757 on: September 03, 2011, 08:30:06 am »
The same way the paralysing lipstick didn't paralyse her in last year's Weeping Angels episode.

It's how lipstick works in the whoniverse.

Offline Person21

  • Crystal Castle Gem Eater
  • *****
  • Posts: 2762
    • View Profile
Re: Doctor Who - Time-shattering Spoilers, be warned.
« Reply #758 on: September 03, 2011, 08:57:13 am »
Because Moff really likes Firefly.
Person21 - As enjoyed by Veraal.
A wise Surface to Air Missile once said about marrying 9 year olds in Saudi Arabia "Its pretty hard to tell if a 9 year old is going to be hot when she grows up, kids change a lot, usually, seems like a bad system. That cute little nine year old you married could end being a fat, zitty teenager."

Offline Haseri

  • Lode Runner
  • *****
  • Posts: 2224
    • View Profile
Re: Doctor Who - Time-shattering Spoilers, be warned.
« Reply #759 on: September 03, 2011, 01:04:23 pm »
Well, it was certainly creepy.

It was also the first episode to bring me to the edge of tears, at the very end.

Also, my friend was in it. She was one of the dolls. You can see her in Confidential when they were practising, the brunette in the grey cardigan.

Offline Krakow Sam

  • Moderator
  • Dungeon Sieger
  • *****
  • Posts: 24493
  • Stern dissaproval
    • View Profile
Re: Doctor Who - Time-shattering Spoilers, be warned.
« Reply #760 on: September 03, 2011, 03:23:02 pm »
Eh, I can't say I rated it very highly.

Sure, those doll things are inherantly terrifying, but its in this really easy arbitrary way. You could almost say lazy. Yeah, of course clowns, china dolls, little girls with long hair and the like are inherantly scary, but without a good context its really easy to just brush it off.
Sam is basically right, he's just cranky.

Offline Person21

  • Crystal Castle Gem Eater
  • *****
  • Posts: 2762
    • View Profile
Re: Doctor Who - Time-shattering Spoilers, be warned.
« Reply #761 on: September 03, 2011, 06:37:38 pm »
Not too good, but nothing that makes me want to throw things at BBC Wales.
Person21 - As enjoyed by Veraal.
A wise Surface to Air Missile once said about marrying 9 year olds in Saudi Arabia "Its pretty hard to tell if a 9 year old is going to be hot when she grows up, kids change a lot, usually, seems like a bad system. That cute little nine year old you married could end being a fat, zitty teenager."

Offline Luminar

  • Gyromite Gyro
  • *****
  • Posts: 4332
  • i'm losin' it
    • View Profile
Re: Doctor Who - Time-shattering Spoilers, be warned.
« Reply #762 on: September 04, 2011, 01:55:07 am »
Just thought it was boring myself. Not face smackingly terrible but nothing good or even ok either.

Offline emmet

  • Street Fighter Champion
  • *****
  • Posts: 10634
    • View Profile
Re: Doctor Who - Time-shattering Spoilers, be warned.
« Reply #763 on: September 04, 2011, 06:34:39 am »
Kind of annoyingly similar to "Fear Her." >_>

But that next episode looks pretty cool, right?
No way dude, you're trolling me.

Offline Krakow Sam

  • Moderator
  • Dungeon Sieger
  • *****
  • Posts: 24493
  • Stern dissaproval
    • View Profile
Re: Doctor Who - Time-shattering Spoilers, be warned.
« Reply #764 on: September 04, 2011, 10:53:35 am »
You're not the only one to spot the similarity Tesla. For all intents and purposes it was the same episode with a slightly higher budget.
Sam is basically right, he's just cranky.