Author Topic: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread  (Read 342378 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Flisch

  • H.E.R.O. Rescue Worker
  • *****
  • Posts: 3546
  • Banned - 17/07/15
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2730 on: January 28, 2013, 07:38:17 am »
What's wrong with Girafarig? There are literally about 100 other pokemon which I'd rather want them to get rid of.
There is, of course, a difference between having a laugh with someone, and having a laugh at their expense

Offline PatMan33

  • Fable Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 28788
  • M I RITE? STICKERS?
    • View Profile
    • DuckDuckGo
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2731 on: January 28, 2013, 10:28:17 am »
I'm glad to hear you say that. See, some people agree with me that Pokemon needs to get rid of a whole bunch of the crap, LURK.

Offline /lurk

  • Dragon Warrior Slime
  • *****
  • Posts: 5251
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2732 on: January 28, 2013, 10:41:29 am »
Some people also think Game Grumps are good and that Sonic doesn't need a car.

Some people are stupid, PAT.
Not a winner anymore.

Offline Didero

  • Turkey Shoot Terminator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3196
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2733 on: January 28, 2013, 11:57:19 am »
I think if the Pokemon game series focussed less on stuffing in more weird creatures and instead changed around and improved the gameplay, the series as a whole would've benefited more.

Then again, I don't watch the cartoon and rarely play the games, so what do I know.

Offline PatMan33

  • Fable Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 28788
  • M I RITE? STICKERS?
    • View Profile
    • DuckDuckGo
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2734 on: January 28, 2013, 12:28:28 pm »
Sonic doesn't need a car, he's Sonic. There's no point in putting him in a car.

Game Grumps are pretty entertaining and have consistently enjoyable shows. They are good.

Pokemon is bogged down with too many stupid and unnecessary Pokemon that have nothing to do with anything except to pad out the TCG so they can sell more ****.

Lurk needs to get off his butt and make sandwiches again like he keeps saying he is going to.

Offline Cobra

  • Moderator
  • All Your Base Zero Wing
  • *****
  • Posts: 8951
  • People want ducks.
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2735 on: February 01, 2013, 12:52:36 am »
I don't care how many useless Pokemon they add to the series as long they can make the game play good and if I can trade in pokemon from prev generations to hatch complete the main quest using the exact team i want then I'm happy.

Offline /lurk

  • Dragon Warrior Slime
  • *****
  • Posts: 5251
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2736 on: September 04, 2013, 08:09:52 pm »
Oh my god you get squirtles in this game.

>MEGABLASTOISE

I'M SO GOD DAMN HYPE GAME OF THE CENTURY

BRB BUYING 3DS
Not a winner anymore.

Offline eropS

  • Out Run Speedster
  • *****
  • Posts: 5137
  • That's right, I went there
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2737 on: September 04, 2013, 09:12:17 pm »
I hope there is a 2DS bundle for cheap.

Otherwise 3DSxl plus pokemon is gonna be a bit aways for me can't wait though
No, no, he did. In the everything else section, at least. Officially, this makes him king.

Offline PatMan33

  • Fable Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 28788
  • M I RITE? STICKERS?
    • View Profile
    • DuckDuckGo
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2738 on: September 04, 2013, 10:09:28 pm »
Gonna get my 3DS repaired and pick up a 2DS. Yey!

Offline Inkling

  • S.T.U.N. Runner
  • *****
  • Posts: 8061
  • Not a Squid.
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2739 on: September 04, 2013, 10:37:46 pm »
Why would you get a 2DS if you already had a 3DS?  What happened to your 3DS?
Probably not a Goat, either.


Offline /lurk

  • Dragon Warrior Slime
  • *****
  • Posts: 5251
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2740 on: September 05, 2013, 05:35:27 am »
System acquired.

Now we wait.
Not a winner anymore.

Offline PatMan33

  • Fable Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 28788
  • M I RITE? STICKERS?
    • View Profile
    • DuckDuckGo
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2741 on: September 05, 2013, 07:41:40 am »
Why would you get a 2DS if you already had a 3DS?  What happened to your 3DS?

The top screen broke and it's a limited edition. It's very hard to get fixed (Nintendo won't do it) and I can't do the complete job myself because I don't have the adhesive or an adequate heat gun to reapply the outer shell once I fix the screen. I'm disappointed with some of the design choices they made with the 3DS. It's much less approachable than the earlier DS models because they've opted for using glue to hold parts of it together rather than screws or clips.

I want the 2DS because I think it's a better design than the 3DS (clam shell designs = Pat thinks they're pathetic), I collect Nintendo systems, and because I want to keep my 3DS away from everyday use.

Offline /lurk

  • Dragon Warrior Slime
  • *****
  • Posts: 5251
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2742 on: September 11, 2013, 10:10:46 am »

Megagarchomp. We're going to need all the fairies we can get.



In other news I like Froakie better than Chespin, but Chespin's evolution more than Froakie's. I guess I need to see the third stages to decide.
Not a winner anymore.

Offline PatMan33

  • Fable Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 28788
  • M I RITE? STICKERS?
    • View Profile
    • DuckDuckGo
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2743 on: September 11, 2013, 10:11:28 am »
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJvpOrzcGbI" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJvpOrzcGbI</a>

Offline Flisch

  • H.E.R.O. Rescue Worker
  • *****
  • Posts: 3546
  • Banned - 17/07/15
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2744 on: September 12, 2013, 01:22:02 pm »
How about a Megameganium? Or a Megayanmega?
There is, of course, a difference between having a laugh with someone, and having a laugh at their expense