Author Topic: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread  (Read 342207 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lush City

  • Crystal Castle Gem Eater
  • *****
  • Posts: 2774
  • Get those blasted Power Rangers!
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2640 on: September 19, 2010, 04:31:37 pm »
Rigray 605: It suddenly happened, 50 years ago, across the desert. No one has seen this Pokemon since then.
Oobemu 606: It manipulates its opponents’ brains and overwrites their memories with different ones.


Aliens! Aliens! ALIENS!

Offline Cobra

  • Moderator
  • All Your Base Zero Wing
  • *****
  • Posts: 8951
  • People want ducks.
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2641 on: September 19, 2010, 05:06:24 pm »
How many legendaries are there this time. It's getting to the point where soon the games will just be filled with legendaries.

Offline Gnoll

  • Track and Field Jock
  • *****
  • Posts: 2471
  • Grrrrr...
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2642 on: September 19, 2010, 05:08:39 pm »
Oh, they'd never do that.
Who are you again and why in the world would you expect anything resembling rationality or civility in youtube comments?

Offline Lush City

  • Crystal Castle Gem Eater
  • *****
  • Posts: 2774
  • Get those blasted Power Rangers!
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2643 on: September 19, 2010, 06:22:53 pm »
How many legendaries are there this time. It's getting to the point where soon the games will just be filled with legendaries.


13

Offline Clarke

  • Jungle Hunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1664
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2644 on: September 19, 2010, 06:31:10 pm »
That's ridiculous.

Offline Rysworld

  • Autoduel Mechanic
  • *****
  • Posts: 4219
  • hhhhhhhh
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2645 on: September 19, 2010, 06:38:33 pm »
One might even say ricockulous.

Offline Lush City

  • Crystal Castle Gem Eater
  • *****
  • Posts: 2774
  • Get those blasted Power Rangers!
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2646 on: September 19, 2010, 06:49:34 pm »
What are you talking about? That's less that nine percent.

Offline Grazony

  • Simon Belmont
  • *****
  • Posts: 5333
  • I am not spying on you.
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2647 on: September 19, 2010, 08:34:58 pm »
They're legendaries. They should be 1% or less. :I

Most of the newer pokemon games I find my favorite legendaries and only consider them the rarest. The rest of the legendaries can go die in a fire.
« Last Edit: September 19, 2010, 08:36:43 pm by Grazony »

You'll never know why.
<_< Ż\[ ◕O ◕]/Ż >_>
Son, I have seen some unbelievable things in my time, but I have never seen a Texan with a robotic chainsaw fist kill a gun-slinging dinosaur by punching it in the head. ~The Soldier

Offline Lush City

  • Crystal Castle Gem Eater
  • *****
  • Posts: 2774
  • Get those blasted Power Rangers!
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2648 on: September 19, 2010, 08:41:23 pm »
Half of them ARE fire. Besides the  gen 2 had a six Percent legendary ratio.
« Last Edit: September 20, 2010, 10:44:57 am by Lush City »

Offline Clayface

  • Jungle Hunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1653
  • user #9
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2649 on: September 20, 2010, 01:35:54 am »
not only is it a redickulous number, but an unlucky one at that

Offline Eagle

  • Donkey Kong King
  • *****
  • Posts: 1047
  • I AM SO FASHIONABLE
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2650 on: September 20, 2010, 10:12:34 am »
The legendary count rises in every generation. 11 was the last gen's count.
I am bloody FASHIONABLE eagle!1!

Offline Lush City

  • Crystal Castle Gem Eater
  • *****
  • Posts: 2774
  • Get those blasted Power Rangers!
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2651 on: September 20, 2010, 10:30:49 am »
Gen IV had 14.

Offline Eagle

  • Donkey Kong King
  • *****
  • Posts: 1047
  • I AM SO FASHIONABLE
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2652 on: September 20, 2010, 10:34:41 am »
Shaymin, Phione and Heatran don't count  >:(
I am bloody FASHIONABLE eagle!1!

Offline Lush City

  • Crystal Castle Gem Eater
  • *****
  • Posts: 2774
  • Get those blasted Power Rangers!
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2653 on: September 20, 2010, 10:42:42 am »
Why not?

They're legendaries. They should be 1% or less. :I

Most of the newer pokemon games I find my favorite legendaries and only consider them the rarest. The rest of the legendaries can go die in a fire.



And, due to further mathematical analysis I realize that your "one percent" rule is total bull****. NONE of the gens fell into that rule (not even your precious gen I) in fact:


GenI: 3.3
GenII: 6.0
GenIII: 7.4
GenIV: 13
Genv: 8.3
Total: 6.7

So your even more full of **** than I thought.
« Last Edit: September 20, 2010, 10:45:18 am by Lush City »

Offline Flisch

  • H.E.R.O. Rescue Worker
  • *****
  • Posts: 3546
  • Banned - 17/07/15
    • View Profile
Re: A Comprehensive Pokémon Thread
« Reply #2654 on: September 20, 2010, 10:59:06 am »
That's a Scotsman fallacy and you know it. What determines what a Digimon "looks like" anyway?
Vaguely humanoid (body features of an animal or whatever, proportions and stance of a human) and random parts attached to certain parts of the body that look like armor, often accompanied by weapon-like body parts, like that Magmar evolution with those canon hands and that turtle evolution mentioned above.
There is, of course, a difference between having a laugh with someone, and having a laugh at their expense