Author Topic: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon  (Read 4032 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 762

  • Goddess of Phobos
  • *****
  • Posts: 5073
    • View Profile
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50234

I've been unable to find the actual footage, so if someone knows where to find it that would be helpful. Thanks!



Spore countdowns: USA Europe

Offline huggkruka

  • Space Ace
  • *****
  • Posts: 2988
  • Totally powers
    • View Profile
    • My Digitalart.org profile
Re: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2006, 01:41:19 pm »
About bloody time. It is the worlds most well-guarded building. Some camera have to have better footage than that crappy old one. I'm actually a bit curious now, cause I have no idea how that plane could have done the damage it did from that weird angle and everything.

Though I'd rather have a new Spore video...  :P

Offline Legodragonxp

  • Excitebike Gearhead
  • *****
  • Posts: 3556
  • Now for some real user power...
    • View Profile
Re: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2006, 05:23:57 am »
CNN has it on a free feed if you want to watch it. It is a pair of parking entrance cameras and the frame rate is horrible. There might not be anythig better than that either. Think about it, why would you have a secuirty camera aimed up in to the sky?

Offline Daxx

  • Golden Axe Battler
  • *****
  • Posts: 8613
    • View Profile
Re: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon
« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2006, 05:46:11 am »
I love Jack Cashill's "rebuttal".

Quote
Sure, OK Thierry, whatever.

What a brilliant way to demonstrate that he's wrong. ::)

Offline aname

  • Starcross Space Cadet
  • *****
  • Posts: 1995
  • The name's Mario, Mario Mario.
    • View Profile
Re: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon
« Reply #4 on: May 17, 2006, 10:34:45 am »
CNN has it on a free feed if you want to watch it. It is a pair of parking entrance cameras and the frame rate is horrible. There might not be anythig better than that either. Think about it, why would you have a secuirty camera aimed up in to the sky?

could you please link it? :)
Back in black, with a gray dry brush and a red stiple effect.

Offline 762

  • Goddess of Phobos
  • *****
  • Posts: 5073
    • View Profile
Re: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon
« Reply #5 on: May 17, 2006, 12:25:49 pm »
www.cnn.com

It's also on google video now: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5658198482624505213&q=pentagon

The framerate is too bad to see anything than a couple images of a fiery explosion.

Spore countdowns: USA Europe

Offline aname

  • Starcross Space Cadet
  • *****
  • Posts: 1995
  • The name's Mario, Mario Mario.
    • View Profile
Re: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon
« Reply #6 on: May 17, 2006, 12:44:06 pm »
i cant see a plane. not nowere. :'( i cant believe it! this. solves. NOTHING! *argh* anyone else annoyed by this >:(
Back in black, with a gray dry brush and a red stiple effect.

Offline SmileyMan

  • Star Wars Padawan
  • *****
  • Posts: 2136
    • View Profile
Re: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon
« Reply #7 on: May 17, 2006, 02:42:55 pm »
Took them quite a long time to edit the footage.

The tip of the airplane is quite sharp from what I've seen in the video.

Offline aname

  • Starcross Space Cadet
  • *****
  • Posts: 1995
  • The name's Mario, Mario Mario.
    • View Profile
Re: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon
« Reply #8 on: May 17, 2006, 05:01:14 pm »
were? i cant see anything.

edit: if you are talking about that tiny point at second 1:15 it hardly counts as a pont on a 747. ive seen em. WAY to blunt for that. (unless someon could find something for me to compare sizes to.
« Last Edit: May 17, 2006, 05:04:54 pm by aname »
Back in black, with a gray dry brush and a red stiple effect.

Offline Piloteer

  • Ensign Seventh Class
  • *****
  • Posts: 2922
  • We're going to hit the mountain!
    • View Profile
Re: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon
« Reply #9 on: May 17, 2006, 05:08:36 pm »
were? i cant see anything.

edit: if you are talking about that tiny point at second 1:15 it hardly counts as a pont on a 747. ive seen em. WAY to blunt for that. (unless someon could find something for me to compare sizes to.

It was a 767 that crashed into the Pentagon, which is a bit smaller than a 747.

Offline aname

  • Starcross Space Cadet
  • *****
  • Posts: 1995
  • The name's Mario, Mario Mario.
    • View Profile
Re: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon
« Reply #10 on: May 17, 2006, 05:53:39 pm »
oh, im sorry, i didnt know that. :) but it still seems to small, maybe its just an illusion of the eye. :)
Back in black, with a gray dry brush and a red stiple effect.

Offline huggkruka

  • Space Ace
  • *****
  • Posts: 2988
  • Totally powers
    • View Profile
    • My Digitalart.org profile
Re: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon
« Reply #11 on: May 17, 2006, 10:35:45 pm »
Still looks like the airplane disappears. It can't have blown up completely? I mean, when the latest space shuttle blew up, they collected conclusive evidence from an explosion far more severe than this one. Yet here there were just a few pieces and basically no wreck. I don't get it.  ???

Offline Legodragonxp

  • Excitebike Gearhead
  • *****
  • Posts: 3556
  • Now for some real user power...
    • View Profile
Re: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon
« Reply #12 on: May 18, 2006, 07:09:33 am »
When a plane crashes in to a solid object (like a concrete wall) it shreds and compacts in to a very small pile. All an airliner is is a very large soda can, and hitting a solid object doesn't leave much to clean up. Most of the aircraft probably ended up inside of a building.

Since I am at work I cannot find the footage, but there was a test several years ago by the DOE (Department of Energy) where they took and old F-4 Phantom fighter, put it on a rocket sled, and fired it in to a concrete wall built to the same specifications as a nuclear reactor wall, there wasn't much left of the aircraft (you can see the wing tips shear off since the plane was slightly wide than the wall section). In fact, if you can find any pictures of any aircraft that flew straight in to the ground at high speed, you'll find that there isn't much to be seen.

Try to find pictures of the wreckage of a SU-27 fighter that crashed at the Paris airshow after it ingested a bird. There are a couple videos of F-18 and F15 fighters hitting the round nose first as well.

I think what people expect to see is a large tail fin, some wing parts, even some fuselage debris outside the building (maybe like the Air France crash and fire in Canada last year). You'll find very little, the plane hit too hard and too fast. (again, watch the F-4 video) .

The video provided by the parking cams is almost worthless. The frame rate is way too slow. At 400mph an airliner would be moving at 600 feet per second (two football fields). It could have been going much faster.

-Lego

Offline 762

  • Goddess of Phobos
  • *****
  • Posts: 5073
    • View Profile
Re: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon
« Reply #13 on: May 19, 2006, 01:18:14 pm »
Yeah, that is a good point, lego. Airplanes have suprisingly little to their shells. They're just a little bit of aluminum skin and an underlying frame. Some of them are even made of cloth.

But 762, then the aircraft would be torn apart by wind!
Not really. There's a spacecraft that, when kept on earth, needs to be pressurized because it would collapse if it weren't. The skin is thinner than a dime. I know there's no wind in space, but there's an assload of wind when you're going a thousand miles an hour up through the atmosphere, and then a thousand miles an hour back down when the mission is done and you're coming home.

Spore countdowns: USA Europe

Offline Legodragonxp

  • Excitebike Gearhead
  • *****
  • Posts: 3556
  • Now for some real user power...
    • View Profile
Re: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon
« Reply #14 on: May 19, 2006, 01:36:54 pm »
Most space rockets and ballistic missiles run on this concept of high internal pressure as a support mechanism. This is why projects like the YAL-1 Airborne laser are getting funding. You don't need to make a big hole to pop a balloon. (not I have theories regarding the YAL-1, but i can save that for another thread someday).

-Lego

werechicken

  • Guest
Re: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon
« Reply #15 on: May 19, 2006, 06:36:09 pm »
or because all current military aircraft + missiles run on combustable fuel and a laser is essentially a giant heat beam

Offline Lambsquirter

  • Megamania Megalomaniac
  • *****
  • Posts: 1718
  • Don't play with your food
    • View Profile
Re: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon
« Reply #16 on: May 20, 2006, 07:35:17 am »
goes to prove they need to install better cameras in the parking lots..fat lot of good this one did
Under construction

Offline Eagleon

  • Phoenix Fighter
  • **
  • Posts: 158
  • Aspiring Crazy Hermit
    • View Profile
    • Personal BS
Re: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon
« Reply #17 on: May 20, 2006, 10:44:52 am »
When a plane crashes in to a solid object (like a concrete wall) it shreds and compacts in to a very small pile. All an airliner is is a very large soda can, and hitting a solid object doesn't leave much to clean up. Most of the aircraft probably ended up inside of a building.

Since I am at work I cannot find the footage, but there was a test several years ago by the DOE (Department of Energy) where they took and old F-4 Phantom fighter, put it on a rocket sled, and fired it in to a concrete wall built to the same specifications as a nuclear reactor wall, there wasn't much left of the aircraft (you can see the wing tips shear off since the plane was slightly wide than the wall section). In fact, if you can find any pictures of any aircraft that flew straight in to the ground at high speed, you'll find that there isn't much to be seen.

Try to find pictures of the wreckage of a SU-27 fighter that crashed at the Paris airshow after it ingested a bird. There are a couple videos of F-18 and F15 fighters hitting the round nose first as well.

I think what people expect to see is a large tail fin, some wing parts, even some fuselage debris outside the building (maybe like the Air France crash and fire in Canada last year). You'll find very little, the plane hit too hard and too fast. (again, watch the F-4 video) .

The video provided by the parking cams is almost worthless. The frame rate is way too slow. At 400mph an airliner would be moving at 600 feet per second (two football fields). It could have been going much faster.
There's a huge difference between a F-4 Phantom and a Boeing 767 transport, in terms of the amount of material involved.

From Boeing's website:
Quote
First flight:     May 27, 1958 (prototype XF-4H-1)
Wingspan:    38 feet 5 inches
Length:    58 feet 3 inches
Height:    16 feet 6 inches

Ceiling:    56,100 feet
Range:    1,750 miles
Weight:    55,597 pounds
Power plant:    Two 17,900-pound-thrust General Electric J79-GE-17 jet engines
Speed:    1,485 mph (max.)
Accommodation:    Two crew
Armament:    15,983 pounds of weapons, including 20 mm nose-mounted M-61 "Vulcan" cannon
Versus:
Quote
First flight:     Sept. 26, 1981
Model number:    767-200
Classification:    Commercial transport
Span:    156 feet 1 inches
Length:    159 feet 2 inches
Gross weight:    300,000 pounds

Cruising speed:    550 mph
Range:    3,840 to 7,800 miles
Ceiling:    43,199 feet
Power:    Two 48,000- or 50,000-pound-thrust P&W JT9D-R4D or 57,900-pound-thrust GE CF6-80A2 engines
Accommodation:    216 to 290 passengers
Keeping in mind, a lot of the photos circulating out there were taken by the ASCE during their Building Performance Report. It states within that most of the debris had been cleared away by the time they were able to inspect the site (9/14).
http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf
Official High-Featherhead of Asciovis Philosophy,
Numquam Perdito.

"I told Gary I'd bring a busload of old ladies over if he'd give me a 10 percent cut." - Quoted completely out of context.
OMG CLICK FOR SPORN!

Offline 762

  • Goddess of Phobos
  • *****
  • Posts: 5073
    • View Profile
Re: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon
« Reply #18 on: May 20, 2006, 01:16:10 pm »
Eagleon, it's not just the amount of material that's in the plane. It's the density. If you launch a 20 pound brick at a wall at 100 miles an hour, and a 25 pound ball of aluminum foil at 100 miles an hour, the foil is probably going to be more deformed and squished at the end because the material isn't as stable.

Spore countdowns: USA Europe

Offline Legodragonxp

  • Excitebike Gearhead
  • *****
  • Posts: 3556
  • Now for some real user power...
    • View Profile
Re: US Federal Gov't Releases Footage of Flight 77 Hitting Pentagon
« Reply #19 on: May 20, 2006, 04:58:50 pm »
You are correct about the differences between an airliner and a fighter plane. An airliner is a very large and proportionally light aircraft when compared to a fighter plane which are very dense since they do not need to carry a change of clothes and extra passengers. Fighter planes need to be very strong to withstand forces nearly 10 times the force of gravity on a regular and repeating basis. Airliners need to tolerate only 1/4 that level of constant strain. (in fact, given the speeds the airliners were reported to be flying at low level, I'm suprised they didn't start coming apart in flight (Boeing still makes a good strong bird I guess)

My opinion is that anything dense enough to be identifiable (engines, wiing root, bulkheads, lawyers, etc...) would have ended up inside the building. The rest would have been shreaded and left both inside and outside of the building. Looking at the link you provided, if I'm reading it correctly, the floor slabs were between 18 and 24 inches of re-enforced concrete. Hit on the edge it would have chopped up the plane (look what a 6inch wide steel slab does to a B-52 when dropped from 40' out at ARAMAC (I'll try to find a link) and that is a stronger aircraft than any airliner)

Also from our link: One witness stays that fine pieces of wing debris were floating down around him. (page 13)


I need to read more of this report (great link BTW) but my son wants some quality time. :)

-Lego