« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Battle for middle earth 2???????  (Read 4381 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Indum

  • Guest
Battle for middle earth 2???????
« on: July 26, 2005, 04:29:11 am »
http://pc.ign.com/articles/636/636177p1.html
They haven't even made an x-pack for the original and they're thinking of a sequel? This is interesting. I didn't like Bfme that much, hopefully BFME 2 will learn from past mistakes.
Logged


Offline Lord Janos

  • Wizardry Whiz
  • ****
  • Posts: 959
    • View Profile
Re: Battle for middle earth 2???????
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2005, 05:06:52 am »
Can't say it interests me - Lord of the Rings games are a big joke really, but yeah, if it's good then that's fine i guess...
Logged

Offline Amberfox

  • Akalabeth Addict
  • **
  • Posts: 183
    • View Profile
Re: Battle for middle earth 2???????
« Reply #2 on: August 07, 2005, 02:19:00 am »
same here. I'm looking forward a lot more to the R:TW expansion  :P
Logged

Theyknownofear

  • Guest
Re: Battle for middle earth 2???????
« Reply #3 on: August 18, 2005, 11:08:15 am »
Well, Nick at ME-MW.com unfortunantly was not impressed.

P.S. It's Indum here I just decided to start a fresh account.
Logged

Offline Tarious

  • Adventure Ace
  • ***
  • Posts: 472
  • FINISH HIM!
    • View Profile
Re: Battle for middle earth 2???????
« Reply #4 on: August 18, 2005, 11:46:54 am »
I'm looking forward to BfME2.
I wasn't able to play BfME1 multiplayer cause for some reason my game always froze when logging onto the multiplayer system.

The 2nd is going to be alot better. For 1, everyones getting walls this time around. A problem with the 1st was that Isengard and Mordor were at a huge disadvantage against multiple medium or hard oponents. I found it easy to fight lots of opponents with walls, cause u can just close the gate and don't have to worry about seige early on.
Then rohans seige was ents which costed a hell load of resources just to buy the spawn point, then the ents costs like 1.2k or 1.4k then treebeard costed alot more, then they would get set on fire to easy.

The main problem was balance.

BfME2 is going to be free build on buildings, so u can place any building anywhere(hopefully they won't do territories like must rts are doing these days.

Also I'm hoping I can play BfME2 online.
Logged

Offline Cool AN

  • Mansion Maniac
  • *****
  • Posts: 6320
  • Life is worth much more than gold
    • View Profile
Re: Battle for middle earth 2???????
« Reply #5 on: August 18, 2005, 11:47:27 am »
Quote from: Theyknownofear on August 18, 2005, 11:08:15 am
Well, Nick at ME-MW.com unfortunantly was not impressed.

P.S. It's Indum here I just decided to start a fresh account.

Niether was I, the only good thing about it was the dwarfs.

I am a moderator there.
Logged

Quote from: /lurk
PALM: Oh face, come closer. I've needed your touch since I heard that fundamentalist Christians were being stupid again.
FACE: Not again! Quickly Palm, come to me!

Offline Bangles

  • Breakout Battler
  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • Pic from Jahelo's Icons - Thanks
    • View Profile
Re: Battle for middle earth 2???????
« Reply #6 on: September 02, 2005, 09:18:39 pm »
Quote from: Tarious on August 18, 2005, 11:46:54 am
I'm looking forward to BfME2.
I wasn't able to play BfME1 multiplayer cause for some reason my game always froze when logging onto the multiplayer system.

The 2nd is going to be alot better. For 1, everyones getting walls this time around. A problem with the 1st was that Isengard and Mordor were at a huge disadvantage against multiple medium or hard oponents. I found it easy to fight lots of opponents with walls, cause u can just close the gate and don't have to worry about seige early on.

I have read up on it and there is still no walls for the evil armys, sorry bout that :-X
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »