Author Topic: Supreme Commander thread (thank me later steve)  (Read 19410 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jonny5

  • Atari Combat Vet
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • The One
    • View Profile
    • Jons Blogs
Re: Supreme Commander thread (thank me later steve)
« Reply #15 on: July 21, 2005, 07:20:52 am »
...........  (speachless)
"there is no spoon"

Offline Tr0n

  • Dragster Diehard
  • ***
  • Posts: 341
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Commander thread (thank me later steve)
« Reply #16 on: July 23, 2005, 01:41:32 pm »
Look an awful lot like the spiritual successor to TA for me... and that's good.  I can't believe the shots of the nukes... that's amazing!  I'm now officially looking forward to this one!
Hey love crusader, I want to be your space invader
For you I will descend the deepest moon crater
I is more stronger than Darth Vapour
Obey me, I is your new dictator

Offline Legodragonxp

  • Excitebike Gearhead
  • *****
  • Posts: 3561
  • Now for some real user power...
    • View Profile

Offline 762

  • Goddess of Phobos
  • *****
  • Posts: 5069
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Commander thread (thank me later steve)
« Reply #18 on: October 04, 2005, 12:53:22 pm »
Looks like 2006 will be a year for all video games! I'll have to get my friend to burn me a copy of TA. I don't think that's illegal, even if it is, Cavedog shouldn't care.

Spore countdowns: USA Europe

Offline Samog

  • Ultima III Time Lord
  • *****
  • Posts: 2856
  • objectivists are dumb
    • View Profile
    • -
Re: Supreme Commander thread (thank me later steve)
« Reply #19 on: October 04, 2005, 01:53:16 pm »
Cavedog can't care anymore, they ceased to exist after Kingdoms.

You never saw this!
"Fine. Don't believe me. I'm not lying. all your laziness which you mistake for something funney is driving me insane, quit fooling around!  dude this is just wrong, very wrong. reality does not consist of constrained language. go lock this thread malt. I love the payment."4MOD

Offline 762

  • Goddess of Phobos
  • *****
  • Posts: 5069
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Commander thread (thank me later steve)
« Reply #20 on: October 05, 2005, 12:54:11 pm »
Cool, so TA isn't their intellectual property anymore? I could claim it as my own?

Spore countdowns: USA Europe

Offline Legodragonxp

  • Excitebike Gearhead
  • *****
  • Posts: 3561
  • Now for some real user power...
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Commander thread (thank me later steve)
« Reply #21 on: October 05, 2005, 02:21:57 pm »
Cool, so TA isn't their intellectual property anymore? I could claim it as my own?


I believe the rights are all owned by Atari... so you might need a lawyer if you wish to proceed. :)

Twiggs

  • Guest

Offline Vivec

  • Gauntlet Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 4885
  • The truth has vanished into darkness...
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Commander thread (thank me later steve)
« Reply #23 on: October 14, 2005, 08:04:04 pm »
Vivec, you're the best forum member ever.

Twiggs

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Commander thread (thank me later steve)
« Reply #24 on: February 03, 2006, 06:30:34 pm »
http://pc.ign.com/articles/685/685669p1.html

Of particular interest to PC gamers, two of THQ's more anticipated titles have been moved back. In a conference call with investors, the company announced it has moved S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl into early 2007 -- a move which will dismay but those who have watched the game's long development, especially given developer GSC Game World's recent announcement that the title was nearing beta. Supreme Commander, the latest project from Gas Powered Games, has also moved to the first part of next year.

Offline Cool AN

  • Mansion Maniac
  • *****
  • Posts: 6326
  • Life is worth much more than gold
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Commander thread (thank me later steve)
« Reply #25 on: February 04, 2006, 02:35:27 am »
I can't wait that long.

Quote from: /lurk
PALM: Oh face, come closer. I've needed your touch since I heard that fundamentalist Christians were being stupid again.
FACE: Not again! Quickly Palm, come to me!

Offline Mangerman

  • Tempest Top Dog
  • ****
  • Posts: 895
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Commander thread (thank me later steve)
« Reply #26 on: February 04, 2006, 07:58:19 am »
First part of next year :o. But maybe its better, because they can work harder to make it the best game on earth  ;D
A multitude of rulers is not a good thing. Let there be one ruler, one king.

Offline Vivec

  • Gauntlet Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 4885
  • The truth has vanished into darkness...
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Commander thread (thank me later steve)
« Reply #27 on: February 04, 2006, 11:00:05 am »
First part of next year :o. But maybe its better, because they can work harder to make it the best game on earth  ;D

*cough* SPORE DAMMIT *cough*
Vivec, you're the best forum member ever.

Offline Golgrig

  • Star Castle Cadet
  • ****
  • Posts: 542
  • I am Will Wright's complete lack of suprise.
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Commander thread (thank me later steve)
« Reply #28 on: February 05, 2006, 02:46:37 am »
between this and defcon this year is covered when it comes to strategy

the whole Nuke a quarter of the map screenshot put this high on my list
"6.4 Um's per minute" or "The Speed of Wright

An adventurer in the land of who gives a ****

The idea is to mix one ingredient that will burn very fast with a second ingredient that will supply enough oxygen for that burning. This burns so fast, it's an explosion.

Offline Mangerman

  • Tempest Top Dog
  • ****
  • Posts: 895
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Commander thread (thank me later steve)
« Reply #29 on: February 05, 2006, 03:30:13 am »
Quote
*cough* SPORE DAMMIT *cough*

Sorry ;), I had forgotten SPORE that moment and ofcourse you are right, Spore will be the best game on earth ;D
A multitude of rulers is not a good thing. Let there be one ruler, one king.